The Great Compromise essays

The Great Compromise expositions In May 1787, fifty-five agents from eleven of the thirteen American states amassed in Philadelphia. Their objective was to update the present government made by the Articles of Confederation, which had been in actuality since 1781. The Articles had made a feeble coalition among the states. The national government had no real way to exact expenses or manage business. The representatives who were in participation at the Philadelphia show had come all in all understanding that there were surrenders in the Articles of Confederation that ought to be helped. However, rather than meeting and choosing to rundown and cure the deformities of the Articles, the agents at the show went in another direction. Not long after George Washington was chosen to be the managing official of the gathering, the Virginia designation, depending intensely on the draftsmanship of James Madison, introduced another arrangement for a completely new national government. This arrangement turned into the primary subje ct of discussion at the show for the following half a month. At the point when the agents chose to make the Virginia Arrangement the focal point of their plan, they had basically changed the undertaking for which they had been sent to Philadelphia. The deformities of the Articles assumed a lower priority in relation to the all the more problem that is begging to be addressed of how to plan a genuine national government. The Virginia Plan required a solid association of the states into a brought together national government. Under the arrangement, the national government would be isolated into three administering branches the administrative, the official, and the legal. The authoritative branch would comprise of two houses. The main house would be straightforwardly picked by the individuals, and the subsequent house would be picked by the principal house from up-and-comers selected by state governing bodies. The official and the national legal executive would be picked by the national governing body. The official alongside certain individuals f rom the legal executive would be chosen to serve on a chamber of modification, which... <!

Battle Of Gettysburg :: essays research papers fc

Chosen Views of the Battle of Gettysburg On July first of 1863 the clash of Gettysburg started. The fight was more less a sudden calamity; neither one of the sides had planed the fight they wound up in a similar spot and the fight started. There where many injured and numerous setbacks. Much like the last fight in The Red Badge of Courage at the point when the vast majority of Henry’s regiment is cleared out by a challenging charge. This charge prompts the ruin of the Alliance just as the fall of Henry’s regiment. 3 days before the skirmish of Gettysburg the Union supplanted General Hooker with General George G. Meade. The Battle kept going for 3 long ridiculous days. The Confederate armed force took overwhelming losses making this battle be a significant defining moment in the war. Despite the fact that the association was losing the war as yet furthermore, out number 75,000 to 97,000, they despite everything figured out how to win this vital battle. â€Å"This was the bloodiest fight in the American history, on American soil† (tqjunior.advanced.org). On the primary day of the fight not much battling occurred, not the entirety of the military was there from either side. It appeared the Confederacy had the high ground from the outset since they had twice the same number of men as the association in the start of fight. Be that as it may, the Union had the new rehashing rifles that reloaded a lot quicker then the Confederacy’s single-load black powder rifles. The Union armed force situated it’s self along wood fences on McPherson’s Edge. These men were one of the primary units to enter the region. They where ready to hold off Lee’s armed force until additional Association troops could show up. The Confederates where not arranged for this new downpour of slugs and they were constrained to begin withdrawing. After a short retreat they refocused and started a flanking assault. The association had to withdraw also, Gettysburg had tumbled to the confederates for the afternoon. The following day there would be promise for the association would have another preferred position. On day 2 the Union soldiers situated themselves on Cemetery Hill and Burial ground Ridge. General Sickles of the association was requested to invigorate Little Round top yet he saw no an incentive in this and progressed to Devil’s Den. After overwhelming battling in Devil’s Lair General Sickles armed force had to withdraw a few times first to the Wheatfield, at that point the peach plantation and at last to Emmetsburg street. There where fights battled at every area just as battling on Culp’s slope that had a well known blade charge by Colonel Chamberlain. General Longstreet was organization to assault Little Round Top, Devil’s Lair, the wheat fields, and the peach plantation.

Effects of Phobias on Your Emotions and Personality

Effects of Phobias on Your Emotions and Personality Phobias Print 5 Common Effects of Phobias on Your Emotions and Personality By Lisa Fritscher Lisa Fritscher is a freelance writer and editor with a deep interest in phobias and other mental health topics. Learn about our editorial policy Lisa Fritscher Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on April 05, 2017 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on July 16, 2019 Dave and Les Jacobs / Blend Images / Getty Images More in Phobias Causes Symptoms and Diagnosis Treatment Types A specific phobia is, by nature, triggered by  a specific object or situation. Unlike  generalized anxiety disorder,  people with a specific phobia are not consumed by pervasive worry and fear. However, a phobia can have a very real impact on a persons daily functioning and quality of life. Common Emotional Effects of Phobias Here are five examples of the emotional effects some people experience as a result of their phobia. Life-Limiting and Severe Anxiety One of the main criteria for diagnosing a phobia is that it is life-limiting in nature. Depending on what your phobia is, you might find it a real struggle to run errands, go out with friends, or even make it to work every day. In other words, a specific phobia  can significantly impair your education, your career, and your overall quality of life.   How Exactly Do You Diagnose a Phobia? Isolation Limitations associated with phobias can make you experience social isolation. You may wonder why you are not like everybody else. This can affect your relationships with family and friends, which could contribute to you becoming reclusive and depressed.   Embarrassment Phobias can create  awkward and embarrassing situations. For example, how do you explain to your best friend that you can never visit her home because she owns a dog? How do you turn down a trip to the Bahamas with a new love because you can’t bring yourself to get on a plane? Social phobia can be especially difficult to manage because the underlying fear is of humiliation. Having a phobic reaction can make you feel embarrassed, which often only reinforces the persistent fear. Feeling Out of Control Perhaps one of the worst emotional components of a phobia is the out-of-control feeling. You may understand that your phobia is irrational and/or excessive, but no matter how hard you try, you cannot get it under control. You are not alone if you spend time thinking about what your life would be like if you could simply live daily without the dread of coming into contact with that specific object or situation.   Helplessness Helplessness may appear when you realize that your phobia has affected several or even all aspects of your life, like your job, social life, and general happiness. You may feel that there is nothing you can do to heal. You may assume that you will always have your phobia. You may wish things were different, but feel that they never will be. A Word From Verywell The good news is that if your phobia is causing any of these distressing thoughts or feelings, be reassured that you can get better with proper  treatment.  Like any mental disorder, it is easy for a phobia to have an impact far beyond its basic symptoms. Treating the phobia will eventually help to reduce negative feelings like shame and helplessness. That being said, while you are in treatment, you may find that some negative feelings remain. Be sure to tell your mental health professional. Further therapy, perhaps from a psychodynamic point of view, can help you to sort out your feelings and concerns. While you are undergoing treatment for a specific phobia, you may find that self-help methods such as stress-relieving tools and relaxation techniques can also help reduce your symptoms.

Ten Arguments Against Teen Abstinence

Continued from the article 10 Arguments For Abstinence - Pros and Cons of Abstinence, Part I Ten Arguments Against Abstinence Telling teens to be abstinent isnot realistic at all said Bristol Palin, daughter of 2008 vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, in her first interview after giving birth at 18.Abstinence means different things to different people, and some forms of abstinence can still spread sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Teens who abstain from vaginal intercourse but engage in oral sex, mutual masturbation or anal sex can still be infected by STDs. Any skin-to-skin contact including genital-to-genital, hand-to-genital or mouth-to-genital can spread disease.Abstinence only works if teens stick to their pledge. But according to researcher Janet E. Rosenbaum of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Taking a pledge doesnt seem to make any difference at all in any sexual behavior.Over the past five years, several major studies have found that abstinence-only education has no effect in stopping or delaying sex. According to Emerging Answers 2007, commissioned by the nonpartisan N ational Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, there does not exist any strong evidence that any abstinence program delays the initiation of sex, hastens the return to abstinence, or reduces the number of sexual partners.Teens who break their vows of abstinence are much less likely to use contraceptives than those who do not pledge abstinence. A report published in the January 2009 issue of Pediatrics found that teens who break their pledge are less likely to get tested for STDs and may have STDs for longer periods of time than teens who do not pledge abstinence.Since teens who pledge abstinence are much less likely to use contraceptives if they break their pledge, their risk of becoming pregnant is significantly greater. A sexually active teen who does not use contraception has a 90% chance of becoming pregnant within a year.The declining in the rate of teen pregnancy nationwide is now recognized as due to increased use of contraception, and not abstinence. According to the Guttmacher Institute, Recent research concluded that almost all of the decline in the pregnancy rate between 1995 and 2002 among 18–19-year-olds was attributable to increased contraceptive use. Among women aged 15-17, about one-quarter of the decline during the same period was attributable to reduced sexual activity and three-quarters to increased contraceptive use.Abstinence sends the wrong message to girls and young women. Author and womens issues advocate Jessica Valenti argues, While boys are taught that the things that make them men — good men — are universally accepted ethical ideals, women are led to believe that our moral compass lies somewhere between our legs....Virginity and chastity are reemerging as a trend in pop culture, in our schools, in the media, and even in legislation. So while young women are subject to overt sexual messages every day, theyre simultaneously being taught — by the people who are supposed to care for their personal and moral development, no less — that their only real worth is their virginity and ability to remain pure.The states with the highest teen pregnancy rates and teen birth rates in the U.S. are either states that do not mandate sex education or HIV education or stress abstinence-only as the primary method of preventing pregnancy.Teens who realize that they may engage in sexual activity take responsibility for preventing pregnancy by choosing a method of contraception in advance. For sexually experienced females age 15-19, nearly all (99%) used some form of contraception at least once during sexual intercourse. Sources:Boonstra, Heather. Advocates Call for a New Approach After the Era of Abstinence-Only’ Sex. Guttmacher Policy Review. Winter 2009, vol. 12, no. 1.Bristol Palin: Abstinence for all teens not realistic. CNN.com. 17 February 2009.Sanchez, Mitzi. Teen Pregnancy: No Contraceptive? 90% Chance Of Getting Pregnant. Huffingtonpost.com. 15 February 2012.Vilibert, Diana. Jessica Valenti Debunks the Purity Myth. MarieClaire.com. 22 April 2009.

Main Characteristics Of The Three Analytical Frameworks...

In this essay, I will outline the main characteristics of the three analytical frameworks supply chain management (SCM), global commodity chains (GCCs) and global production networks (GPNs) and assess their strengths and weaknesses. The approaches differ and share similarities in their objectives, ideas, actors, perspectives, focus and conceptual tools. Firstly, Supply Chain Management approach is characterised in its focus on comparative advantage through cost and value advantage. It can be perceived as being too prescriptive in its insistence to evaluate the firm’s activities, how they interact to identify core competency areas or sources of comparative advantage, reach a ‘make or buy’ decision, where periphery activities are to be†¦show more content†¦The framework takes into account a limited number of actors including, the firm, suppliers and customers. However, although this carries a weakness for resulting in a narrow view with limited number of actors and too much focus on the firm, its strength lies in its deep focus into the firm which has laid the foundation on how firms operate, over which the GCC and GNP approach is built such as comparative advantage and flow of value. There is repeated emphasis on ‘interdependent relationship’ and coordination between parties within supply cha ins however â€Å"the authors appear to assume that everyone knows who is a member of the supply chain. There has been little effort to identify specific supply chain members, key processes that require integration or what management must do to successfully manage the supply chain.† (Lambert, Cooper ; 2000) Another important point outlined in this framework stemming from the comparative advantage concept is the alternative to vertical integration (Porter, 2004). To be a lead firm, it is not necessary to vertically integrate and to own all resources, it is more important to strategically position the firm to internalise core activities and externalise other activities. However, It is too focused on getting to the top of the chain and does not offer any insight to firms at the bottom of the chain on how to move up. Although, there is mention of varying bargaining power of firms with coalition partners influencing how gains are

12 Angry Men by Talita E. Sigillo Free Essays

Based on the movie  «12 angry men » In the movie  «12 angry men », one can explore a variety of fallacies and generalizations. Each juror except for one comes in with a verdict of  «Guilty », but by using critical thinking the reasons to support their claim are dismissed one by one. Except for Juror number three who is the last one to change his verdict. We will write a custom essay sample on 12 Angry Men by Talita E. Sigillo or any similar topic only for you Order Now He disregards all critical reasoning and sticks to his initial claim using multiple fallacies to support it. He is clearly prejudiced towards the defendant no mater the evidence brought forward to him. Only at the end does he realize that all this time he was seeing his own son in the eyes of this boy, a son that had  «disrespected » the father. Him. Following are only some of the multiple fallacies juror number three used to support his claim. One of the very first fallacies juror number three uses is  «begging the question.  » This is when one states an opinion as though it is a well known fact. When he first enters the room he claims  «everyone knows he is guilty!! and when asked by the critical thinker to explain the reasons for his claim the juror answers:  «everything Says he is guilty » by using this reason he again is  «begging the question » and simultaneously uses  «Circular reasoning » since he restates his claim as though it is reason. Moreover when analyzing the two testimonies, the critical thinker finds ways to prove that there is a reasonable doubt in the two witnesses testimonies. Again juror number three uses more than one fallacy to claim that he has no reasonable doubt.It was brought to their attention that the woman who testified that she had seen the boy kill the father couldn’t actually see someone clearly. This claim was supported with the following reason and train of thought: The glimpse of the murder was seen through her bedroom window, the window of the moving train, across the street and through the victim’s apartment window.  «Could, who the woman saw commit the murder, be someone else »? Juror number three claimed that the  «woman testified in court » and also said  «The woman said she saw him » and finally ended with  «the woman saw it! After reasonable doubt to the testimony is applied, juror number three used the above quotes as his reasons to support his claim tha t it was the boy that the woman saw, concluding with evidence that do not follow through with his claim and thus being  «non sequitor ». Juror number three still had a valid reason to believe the boy had committed the murder since the man’s testimony was that he heard the boy shout out the phrase  «I’m going to kill you!  » to his father and that the old man who testified in court, saw the boy running down the stairs and that he heard the body fall.Through critical thought and analysing the evidence piece by piece, it was pointed out that, since the murder took place during the passing of a train, the old man could not have possibly heard the body fall and that it took him too long to cross his room and open the door for him to have seen the boy after committing the murder. Still juror number three voted guilty saying he had no reasonable doubt that  «the boy said ‘I’m going to kill you’ and he killed him » at this point he was using circular reasoning, restating his claim as a reason.It was at this point that the critical thinker decided to prove his point to juror number three, he provoked him so much to the point that he said  «I’m going to kill you!!  » to the other juror who provoked him, it was brought to his attention that a lot of them could have  «criminal tendencies » like the boy, but having them did not mean acting upon them. It was then that juror number three started loosing control. All the reasons he was using to mask the truth about why he was convicting the boy had been questioned leaving him with no logical warrants to support his claim of guilty.When questioned again  «what proof do you have that the boy is guilty?  » he answers with a  «Red Herring » that he is  «entitled to his opin ion » By the end of the movie his true premise behind the verdict of guilty was came to the surface. Juror number three had a son that had gotten in an argument with him and had stopped talking to him. This, according to the values in which the juror was raised, was disrespect and disrespect was inexcusable towards the father. It was obvious, that he prioritized respect to the father above everything else, when he said  «It doesn’t matter what his father did it’s his father and you can’t say ‘I’ll kill you’ to you father!  » This value that he prioritized along with the incident with his son was what had clouded his judgement and affected his point of view. Juror number three was therefore unable to critically look at the evidence presented since he was prejudiced towards the boy. For Juror number three the boy was guilty to begin with for disrespecting his father witch is this Jurors highest value. How to cite 12 Angry Men by Talita E. Sigillo, Papers

Saltaire was solely built for the workers Essay Example

Saltaire was solely built for the workers Essay I believe that the village Saltaire was not purposely built solely for they enjoyment of the workers. Even though there are some buildings at the site (saltaire) that were used for the enjoyment of the workers, Salt always got the most out of the workers. In this coursework I shall explain the points that make many peoples attitudes on Titus Salt as an entrepreneur and views that influence ideas on him being a philanthropist. It will also be explained why certain buildings were built in Saltaire. The designing and making of the mill, the building of the houses and Tituss constant search for new ideas all add a great deal of evidence that he was an entrepreneur. However there is a sufficient amount of ideas that prove otherwise e. g. The Park, dining hall, and the church. I will now explain each point in more detail. Titus Salt was a very rich man and he could have hired the very best architects in the country to design the mill in Saltaire. Although it would have made sense to do so, he hired local architects Henri Lockwood and William and Richard Mawson. We will write a custom essay sample on Saltaire was solely built for the workers specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Saltaire was solely built for the workers specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Saltaire was solely built for the workers specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer They designed many plans for the mill however they were rejected. Eventually a i 100 000 plan was accepted by Titus Salt. Work commenced in 1851 and ended in 1853. Salt used local Yorkshire stone in his building of the mill and it was designed in an Italianate style. He based certain parts of the mill on Prince Alberts Osborn house. One very interesting feature of the mill is that it is shaped as a T. This may be to show anyone who viewed the mill that Titus had built it. This helps give an impression that he was an entrepreneur and cared about getting his name well known. Titus built the mill fireproof and had an air conditioning system fitted. This point indicates that Salt didnt want any damage to the mill, as it would cost money to repair. The air conditioning system was most likely fitted because it would ensure that workers were taking less breaks and could produce more goods. Titus made a lot of money from the mill and made him the largest employer in Bradford because of his popularity. Salt was constantly looking for new ideas. This aids us to form an impression that Titus Salt was a businessman that had his mind set on making more money. The point made is proved when Titus was walking on the south beach of Scarborough, staring at the seaweed. Titus finally concluded that seaweed Wont do. Titus made his first mistake when he purchased a large load of Donskoi wool. It was considered impossible to spin and when Titus attempted to sell the wool no one would purchase it. However he was still determined that he could spin the wool. He was so convinced that he would not fail that he rented Thompsons mill and he managed to prove everyone wrong. Titus had entered the spinning business. In 1836 Titus made another mistake that eventually made him a richer man. He saw 300 bales of Alpaca from Liverpool. He saw a great opportunity arising and purchased the Alpaca. Many close to Titus Salt tried to discourage him and make him go no further with his experiment. His father called it Nasty stuff, yet Titus who was successful with Donskoi wool once again managed to prove them all wrong. He was made an extremely rich man. Titus operated five mills in Bradford. The wearing of the wool was made fashionable when Queen Victoria began to wear Alpaca dresses. Titus Salt didnt stop there; he experimented with other wool from around the world. Salt had houses built for his workers. They were beneficially placed in Saltaire near the mill. This proved Tituss belief on getting the workers to the mill on time. Titus also figured out that there was another way to gain money here. He decided to make the workers pay rent so eventually he would get all the money paid on the houses back. Titus wanted to keep control over all of his workers. He came to a decision that he would arrange them according to standard in their jobs. He cleverly placed managers next to workers so he could sustain control. This indicates that Salt wanted his workers minds to stay focused on their work rather then their social lives outside work. It further shows Sir Titus Salts craze to make more money. Concentrating on small points and sections of the village and the workers helped do this. I will now comment on the key features that prove that Titus Salt cared for his workers and backs up, as evidence, that the statement that Saltaire was solely built for the workers. One day in 1871 the mill was unusually shut down early. The workers were told to assemble in the park that Titus had made. The making of the park shows that Salt cared for his workers by providing them with some open space. This improved the health and even the mental health of the workers. The park signals that Titus was a philanthropist rather then an entrepreneur, as he was gaining no more money with the park open instead Titus lost a considerable amount of money building the park. The park consisted of a boathouse, a river, a cricket and croquet ground, bowling greens, and alcoves. This clearly provides evidence that the park was solely built for the workers enjoyment. Next, I will comment on the dining hall, which Titus built. The hall was built completely for his staff. There they would have their meals made. Although food could be purchased, the workers were entitled to bring in their own food and use the facilities to cook. The using of the facilities was free of charge. This indicates that Titus Salt cared for his workers and desired the best for them and not caring for cost much. To cap it all off the diner charged half price broth and soup left over between 1. 0 pm and 2. 00 pm. This kind of attitude earned Salt a well treating boss image. As the opening of the park gave Salt a philanthropist image, the dining hall gave the same image out. The congregational church, now the United Reformed church was touted a palace built for God, when it was finally constructed in 1859. Lockwood and Mawson built the church in the Italian style, which Sir Titus liked. T he church cost i 16 000 and was considered as one of the best Italian style buildings in England. It is now listed as a grade one building. The entrance of the site contained six large Corinthian columns witch had a tower, which contained a bell that was sold in the war. Salts wife desired to have a family balcony built and Titus took up the request though he did not sit inside it. Instead he desired to sit amongst his workers. This signals Tituss equality with his workers. Titus could have sat in the balcony though he chose not to. This influenced ideas of Titus being a philanthropist, caring about the well being of his workers. In addition the workers didnt have to pay a thing to worship at he church. If Titus were an entrepreneur he would have seized the opportunity to make the workers pay to worship at the church. Instead he did not and made the worshipping in the church free to his workers. I will now comment on more complicated ideas that can be viewed from two separate angles to give two different views and attitudes on Titus Salt. As I have just explained that the dining hall was viewed as a philanthropists idea. This was because hot meals were made for the workers. They could also bring in their own food and use the facilities to prepare their own food. The use of Facilities was free of charge. Special offers were also made in the dining hall. Although there are many reasons behind the buildings of the dining hall from a view that proves Titus as a philanthropist there are also many reasons, which support the idea that he was an entrepreneur. With refreshing and nice hot meals better productivity would certainly take place. The workers would not get as ill or as hungry with the dining hall. So in the long run Titus would be able to pay himself all the money the dining hall cost with all the profit gained from the better productivity. The mill was supposedly to have been made for the workers to give them jobs. The mill attracted workers to work in better conditions. The mill ensured safety, as it was fireproof, machines were made safe by Salt and an air conditioning system was fitted in to ensure coolness throughout the mill. However all the safety measures guaranteed more work done by the workers and better productivity, as they were not scared to cause injuries to themselves. The air conditioning system made certain that less breaks were taken, as it was nice working conditions. Titus built tunnels to get workers to work, underground. These ensured that workers wouldnt have to walk far to work. This showed that Sir Titus Salt would go to extreme lengths to get his workers satisfaction. Though there are some strong points above the tunnel may have been made for business reasons. Building tunnels helped workers to get to work faster then usual so they could start work earlier. This showed how entrepreneur Titus was. I conclude that Titus Salt was not a philanthropist while making Saltaire. I think that Titus carefully considered every business deal possible. This is shown as he selected Saltaire as it had a railway and a canal. In order to become a philanthropist Titus Salt had to become an entrepreneur to gain all his money so he could make some buildings for his workers. I believe that Titus first made Saltaire for business reasons and maybe made some sights for his workers e. g. the park. Although this is my personal suggestion there is a sufficient amount of evidence to make Sir Titus Salt either an entrepreneur or a philanthropist.