Comparing Characterization in Alias Grace, Their Eyes...

Characterization in Alias Grace, Their Eyes Were Watching God, and Fools Crow Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood is a novel where the main character Grace is a sort of mystery character. In the end she is at peace, but there are still many questions about her left unanswered. Because Atwoods style of writing is informative, yet unclear at the same time, the audience is left to put the pieces of the puzzle that is Grace together themselves. This leaves the reader guessing about her character. Two other works that contrast the characterization of Grace Atwood uses in Alias Grace are Janie in Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston, and Fools Crow in Fools Crow by James Welch. The characterization the authors use†¦show more content†¦You learn all there is to know about Janie through her three marriages. Her take on love and marriage is make very clear by the end of the book. She saw a dust-bearing bee sink into the sanctum of a bloom; the thousand year sister-calyxes arch to meet the love embrace...So this was marriage! (Hurston 11). He r thoughts are so detailed and rich. She is the type of character who is easy to relate to. According to the Kingwood College Librarys site on Zora Neale Hurston, the whole novel is based around Janies journey in trying to find herself. Her thoughts and feelings are expressed fully throughout the novel and there are no doubts about the type of sincere, living woman that she is. It is not difficult to guess how she will react in different situations. Janie and Grace are opposites when it comes to emotion and expression. Atwood made Grace intelligent, but she doesnt do a lot of reflecting on love and her life in general. Throughout Their Eyes Were Watching God Janie spends a lot of her time pondering love and how it fits into her life. From the beginning of her story under the pear tree Janie undergoes the process of self-discovery... (Novel Guide 1). Grace, on the other hand, doesnt express or experience love even when she marries Jaime Walsh at the end of the book. I have been married to Mr. Walsh for almost a year now, and although it is not

Case Study Owner Of The Hotel Kallessi Mctavish

Introduction Given task for advice to concerned hotel manager Maya Stork against owner of the hotel Kallessi McTavish is a case when given authorities have also certain restrictions which should be followed to avoid unpredictable or unnecessary problems. In hospitality business is a phenomenon, that miscommunication and lack or wrong information can occur very often. Communication is a key for success in hospitality and this can be provided by both sides, employers either employees. According to the authorities and restrictions there are two cases, where similar problems occurred. These cases will be used to advice manager Maya Stork and also provide essential information of managing particular situations in the future. This case is great†¦show more content†¦Regardless of this restriction, order was made and delivered even with several boxes of not permitted expensive shampoo and shower gels. First couple of invoices for orders were paid without hesitation and rest was refused to pay by KM. Unfortunately, this action has an impact on MS where KM is demanding his loss. Cases Two cases were obtained to support opinion how the dispute can be solve with minimum impacts on both sides. 1. Watteau v Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346 Concern: Participating person in charge of a public house was not permitted to buy goods for the business due all goods were depending on strict behalf of the principal, which is the employer. Manager ordered certain publication regardless of his restriction for purchasing goods. Result: Principal was forced to pay without hesitation due order was made within usual authority of the manager and without awareness to supplier of manager restrictions. 2. Milne v Ritchie [1882] 10 R 365 Concern: Milne as an architect had a authority to negotiate and contract for masonry construction, worth  £1465. He accepted other side offer for work worth  £1646. Ritchie’s work was done to high standards where Milne as an employer had to pay offered price of  £1646. Result: Fiduciary Duty (a Duty of loyalty and good faith). Advice and Discussion Kallessi McTavish v Maya Stork Various type of authority appeared in

Marrying for Money Free Essays

â€Å"I’m a little shocked at t he numbers,† says Pamela Smock, a sociologist at the University of Michigan who has studied marriage and money. â€Å"It’s kind of against the notion of love and soul mates and the main motivations to marry in our culture.† (Frank, 2007). We will write a custom essay sample on Marrying for Money or any similar topic only for you Order Now These shocking words that came out from a sociologist only suggests that in modern times, money should still be not the reason for marrying. It is a fact however that money is a big driving force for someone who wants to get married. At the back of their minds, there is the constant reminder of reality like divorce or annulment. However, they should also consider why they got into the relationship in the first place. Relationships are not built based on money. Moreover, one does not dwell into a relationship with the primary concern of money; whereas; it should have been the connection and the love that the partners share. Getting married is not like a hot potato that you can eat and spit out the moment that you discovered that it is too for you to handle. Marriage is a lifetime relationship and commitment; and this very same basis should be built on love, trust and respect. Ultimately, it should not be money because it devoid the vow that they made in front of the authority (may it be religiously or lawfully speaking). No matter how money plays a very important role in our society today, marriage should still be based on the wanting of both people to stay together for the rest of their lives. Additionally, since most of people these days are very agitated into climbing their way into the corporate world. People who want to settle down are the ones that have already made a niche in their fields. This only implies that they have everything they want or could ever want so the concept of money is the least on their priority. In addition, there are such things as pre-nuptial agreements which protect the assets of both parties. And people who sign to such agreements only want to protect their hard-earned money; so it is wrong to say that people want to marry for money. People who want to make money out of marriage are the ones who see it (marriage) as business or a way to get what they want. People who have mindsets like that are very superficial. Their concept of marriage very different from what it really is. Instead, they put a price tag to marriages. However, there are cases wherein people settle down more than once but it is enough to say that they married for money. Take for example Elizabeth Taylor who married five different guys. She is rich on her own that is why she married those guys because she wants to be committed with them for eternity. This only implies that once again, people who want to get married should want to do it because they want to spend the rest of their lives with that special someone. Since most people who want to get married are successful in their chosen field, that is the time that they want someone to spend their life with. Even though the person is really doing well, they cannot be considered truly successful unless they want to achieve real happiness. And marriage, in its purest form, is the only way to achieve that goal. Alongside the desire that you want to share your life with that special someone, the ultimate goal why someone should get married is the happiness that marriage can bring into your life. Marriage is about raising a family and that can give you an ultimate high that not even any achievement can bring. Money is a measure of how successful you are but a happy marriage is also another. Money come and go but family will not. Marrying because of money is a very superficial reason. Marriage is about a commitment of two people to become one which have the same mindset of achieving a happier state in life.   Marriage should be built on trust; respect and love because those really are the basic foundation of a successful future family which ultimately is one of the measurements of how successful you have become. References: Frank, R. (2007). Marrying for Love†¦of money [Electronic Version]. The Wall Street Journal.Retrieved January 16, 2008   from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119760031991928727.html.                      How to cite Marrying for Money, Essay examples

Compare and Contrast the Images of London Essay Example For Students

Compare and Contrast the Images of London Essay Composed Upon Westminster Bridge was a poem written by the famous poet, William Wordsworth in 1802. Poets traditionally studied pastoral images because cities had not evolved into the important place which they have now. Wordsworth realized that more people where beginning to live in cities and that they were becoming more important and more significant in peoples lives. Ian McMillan created a 21st Century version of Wordsworths poem, which shows how much places can dramatically change over a period of time. I shall compare and contrast the way in which each poet uses their language to convey their different images of past and present day London. William Wordsworth was born and raised in the Lake District, in England. He had a great appreciation for nature, which is apparent in many of his poems. He also had strong beliefs in pantheism. He was a crucial figure in the English Romantic Movement. He wrote the poem Composed Upon Westminster Bridge in the early hours of the morning on the third of September 1802. He composed it as he travelled across Westminster Bridge in a carriage and looked over London city, while most people were still sleeping in bed and when London was at its most dormant. The message of the poem is very clear, that London is one of the most beautiful landscapes at that time of the morning. The whole poem is perfectly formed around a Petrarchen sonnet. As it is a sonnet it consists of only fourteen lines in which Wordsworth has to write the poem. This means his language has to be specific and meaningful to make his message clear by the end of the poem. Wordsworth sets the tone for the rest of the poem in his first few lines of the octave: Earth has not any thing to shew more fair: Dull would he be of soul who could pass by A sight so touching in its majesty; These lines capture the audience by telling us that London is the fairest thing on earth, which is a bold statement. He suggests that only dull souls could not recognise its splendour. This emphasises the beauty of London dramatically, as he does not imply it is beautiful, but tells us it is the most beautiful sight. Wordsworth uses several linguistic techniques throughout the poem to create picturesque images. This City now doth like a garment wear The beauty of the morning; silent, bare, The use of personification here creates the image of the city wearing beauty, where beauty is a garment. Like a garment the beauty would be taken off or removed during the day, when the city is at its busiest and therefore least appealing. Wordsworth uses a semicolon and commas to make a caesura. This creates a small pause for the reader to absorb the silence. This gives a better picture of how peaceful London is and also adds a slow rhythm to the reading of the poem, which ties in with the relaxed nature of it. Moreover Wordsworth uses a persuasive style to communicate his message. The choice of language, which is used, is important to how the audience perceives the poem. Neer saw I, never felt, a calm so deep! The use of the word never leads us believe that this view is so spectacular that it does not compare with anything he has ever seen before. Furthermore Wordsworth uses personification to create an image. The river glideth at his own sweet will: Wordsworth almost gives the river its own character by saying that it glides at its own sweet will. The use of the verb glide makes it sound peaceful and calm. .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 , .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .postImageUrl , .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 , .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:hover , .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:visited , .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:active { border:0!important; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:active , .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9 .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u6cce534ddf3e5b1dcdd6dc685febe8e9:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Poetry Essay SummaryWordsworth was a strong believer in pantheism and he was also quite religious: Dear God! the very houses seem asleep; Wordsworths use of God in this line makes it sound as if he is astonished at how beautiful it is. He also builds personification into it once more, by saying that the houses seem asleep. This enhances the image of outstanding beauty which Wordsworth is trying to create. Wordsworths poem builds a clear message, which is enforced in many linguistic techniques and styles. He uses several examples of personification to share his message. He makes an extremely clear message that London is at its most beautiful during sunrise, and possibly the most beautiful sight ever. Commissioned by the Globe Theatre in the year 2002, Ian McMillan wrote the poem titled Wordsworths Return To Westminster Bridge. It strikes me immediately how very different both poems are. This is most definitely because of the effect 200 years has had on London. In the space of two centuries an industrial revolution has occurred making the city of London larger, with more people and more buildings. In fact, land which used to be fields is now covered with buildings and roads, in contrast to Wordsworths time. The message of McMillans poem is that London is an awful dirty place and that he is reluctant to live there. As McMillan is working off Wordsworths poem, it seems that he is arguing and trying to prove a point to Wordsworth, that his image of London is wrong. McMillans poem is structured around a Shakespearean sonnet. The rhyme scheme, which he has achieved, is not exactly a Shakespearean sonnet, but very similar to one. Nowadays this is not unusual for a poem not to follow the rhyme scheme precisely. Most poets improvise on it, which gives it originality. The fact that the poem lacks punctuation is also a more regular occurrence in present day poetry. This style lacks order and reflects the message that is being portrayed. The first two lines of McMillans poem show us immediately what he is doing with the tone of the poem: Earth has not any thing to show more fair (Well, to be honest, actually it does) McMillan begins with almost the same line as Wordsworth to make it apparent that he is reviewing Wordsworths poem. McMillan begins his criticism of London by the second line by stating that he disagrees with what he has said. The brackets used to punctuate this line give it a personal touch, as if McMillan has just read the beginning line and has added his own opinion. This would capture the audience, because he is sharing his opinion, which makes it more interesting. It also quite informal to use brackets, which builds upon the tone of disorder within the style of the poem. Once again McMillan gives us an insight on how different London has become since Wordsworths time: I cant hear myself think above the buzz The use of buzz is a good example of onomatopoeia and creates an idea for the reader of what it is actually like. This gives us a clear message. McMillan suggests that he cannot concentrate because of the intense noise, whereas Wordsworth increasingly built upon the image of tranquillity. McMillan also uses linguistic techniques to create an image with his words. Who move across the bridge as slow as sludge Who point and gawp and spit and swear and trudge The use of a simile as slow as sludge gives a very good image of what is happening. It also sets a mood. The word sludge is in my opinion very negative and dreary, therefore passing that dreary image on to the people. The use of and repeatedly creates a list. All the things, which are in this list are negative verbs. It emphasises the iambic pentameter and gives it a slow rhythm. This makes it seem like there are lots of negative points because of the way it is so dragged out. This greatly enhances the image created. .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 , .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .postImageUrl , .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 , .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:hover , .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:visited , .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:active { border:0!important; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:active , .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0 .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud8fc1d138ed6fbe555878e8902ee77f0:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: How Seamus Heaney presents childhood in "Death of a naturalist" and "Mid term break" EssayFurthermore McMillan alters Wordsworths lines to convey the opposite message. The opening of the sestet in Wordsworths poem: Never did sun more beautifully steep, is transformed into: Never did sun more grudgingly shine This slight alteration to the adverb portrays a totally different image. Grudgingly implies that the sun does not want to shine over London because it is so ugly, in contrast to Wordsworth who implies that the sun is proud to shine over the city. There is also a tone of confusion in the third line of the sestet: Which drop like confetti on empty bottles of wine The image of confetti dropping is generally related with weddings and celebrations, a good positive image, whereas the wine bottles are empty. This confusion makes the audience unsure, which gives the impression of London being a mess. The final line of the poem shows how much McMillan loathes London. He says how he is happy that he lives in the civilised north, referring to the north of England. This would imply to the audience that London, the south, is not civilised, but savage and dirty. I have compared and contrasted the differences in poetic style and imagery in both poems. Wordsworths poem brings out the full potential beauty in London, whereas McMillans poem shows the modern day reality of dirt and pollution, which is now found in most cities. London would have dramatically evolved from what it was 200 years ago because of advances in technology, meaning people depend on machines more than manual labour. This would draw people from the countryside into the city and the city would therefore get larger with more and more buildings. Personally I prefer McMillans version of Wordsworths Composed Upon Westminster Bridge . Wordsworths Return To Westminster Bridge is more realistic and a clearer picture of what a city is, for me. This is probably because I could not depict a city as being beautiful.